Hi Regina,
On 1/24/22 15:51, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi Armin, hi all,
a light can be 'harsh' or 'not harsh' (that means 'soft') in an
extruded custom shape. This is independent from the material property
'specular'. A 'soft' light is rendered in MS Office, as if the light
has a wider emitting area in real world.
There are of course possible definitions for that. 'Our' light source is
kept pretty simple. We have a point light source with direction, no
position (all parallel). I remember that only a fraction of
possibilities - the needed ones as so often - were taken into account at
that time. I already had to fight to get all those 3D features we have
today :-) Sure technically these can be extended. We could add a
point/position, so make lighting position-dependent if wanted. Also
definitions for a size of a light source are common/possible - that
would lead to the light coming not only from one point, but from a
sphere surrounding that point. I am not straightforward sure how to do
that mathematically, but this just means to dig out the standards &
integrate them. AFAIR we tried to keep as close to OpenGL at that time,
so the 'old' OpenGL definitions should be most
doable/integratable/fitting/implementable (due to that 1st integration
of OpenGL 20++ years ago, had to be removed after 1y due to OpenGL not
being stable enough on target systems - a problem on SW even with just
1% problems but scales to millions of users...).
As so often problem will be more to adapt the model data, processing,
file formats, UI, etc..., then the visualization I guess. The 3D
fallback SW renderer can/should be easily extended if you know what you
do, it is modular. Also always a good point is to keep an eye on
compatibility to standards, if we want to impl system-dependent 3D
renderers, too.
One Q stays open, though: AFAIR those defs will/may also influence
shadow which in case of soft light with non-hard boundaries will have to
soften/fade, too. That would be expensive since shadow of 3D is not part
of 3D scene, but generated 2D geometry that then would have to be faded
-> pixel operations & in theory full back/forth transform 2D/3D to do
that mathematically correctly. Also shadow on other 3D objects would be
more difficult/expensive if we would once need that (not yet needed).
Does our competitor do that...?
HTH for the moment,
ALG
The UI of our 3D-Scenes does not have something in this kind. Is there
in the internal handling of 3D-Scenes something, that can easily be
extended to produce such light effect?
Currently I experiment with using additional lights in the 3D-scene
that is used to render an extruded custom shape. But that emulates the
effect not really good and means a large effort.
Kind regards,
Regina
--
--
ALG (PGP: EE1C 4B3F E751 D8BC C485 DEC1 3C59 F953 D81C F4A2)
