On 11/10/2021 19:24, Julien Nabet wrote:
(Sorry, without Nabble anymore, I don't know how to properly respond).
In response to Stephan:
"And if it would turn out not be used, why bother fixing the typo? :)"
Just to have the right spelling because it's boring to see this kind of
typo ("boring" is an understatement for me, personnally I really hate
letting typos)
So can we fix this or not?
I would strongly suggest not to, as css.sheet.XAddIn is an interface
intended to be implemented by 3rd-party code (see e.g.
odk/examples/DevelopersGuide/Spreadsheet/ExampleAddIn.java).
On 10/10/2021 11:13, Julien Nabet wrote:
Hello,
I noticed a typo in function name "getProgrammaticFuntionName" instead
of "getProgrammaticFunctionName".
(see
https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/offapi/com/sun/star/sheet/XAddIn.idl?r=2b383d19#51).
Usually I would have supposed we're stuck since it's in a public
interface but the current implementations just return an empty
OUString (unless I missed something) so wonder if it's really used.
Julien
PS : "Errare humanum est" but just wonder why these function names
aren't double/triple-checked by at least 2 people before being
published...
