Re: llvm/clang static analyzer reports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,


On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 8:48 AM Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sure, can't hurt to document the approach you've taken.  So if that's
not much additional work, sounds good to me to add a script to
dev-tools.  You can add me as reviewer.

Alright, I'll do that then.

Just one more thing I need to mention. At some point during the build/analysis, I run into the following:

The analyzer (or make, I can't tell which) goes looking for '/usr/bin/clang-10++' (which isn't there) instead of '/usr/bin/clang++-10'. In other words, it looks for clang-version++ instead of clang++-version. I haven't really investigated much, but chose to be pragmatic and just add a symlink to work around the issue. If this is an acceptable workaround, I'll add a README that mentions this. On the other hand, if this is a dealbreaker and people want this 'fixed' before continuing, then I am going to need a lot of help in finding the root cause (so I can submit a bug report with the project that causes the behaviour).

 
(I've not yet come around to
thinking about how to handle the false positives, which would IMO be a
prerequisite to running this on a regular basis.)

Understood.



- Maarten

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux