On 7/7/19 4:35 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
On 07/07/19 17:06, Tor Lillqvist wrote:For the reference: we have a bug report since 2011 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34002 and the corresponding openoffice bug report from 2002 is linked in the ticket... Which should be a good indication that the request is unreasonable.I think you mean "impractical" :-( How is it unreasonable for support guys to want to be able to debug their lusers' documents? How is it unreasonable for people like me to want to use a modern word processor, but be able to use it in a manner that we are comfortable, rather than be forced into a "one size fits all" extremely uncomfortable fairy tale bed ... I was serious when I suggested that Uwe's best case for fixing his documents was to "save as plain text" and start again. Bit tricky if the document is full of graphics and other stuff ... Cheers, Wol
I now possess a copy of the offending .docx document and the PDF version of it. (It contains 1.6MB, so it will take some time.) Tomorrow, I will be determining what is necessary to fix it. Rather than guess as to what would be required, I will find out. I think this would be much more useful for others. I will report back when I am finished.
Additional observation as in a personal opinion: this discussion has grown to a great length without really solving the problem. Such was the case for similar discussions before. (I seem to remember that one time it involved OOo prior to 3.0.)
One thing I do know: an .odt file is based on styles. The only codes that are used are styles. This is obvious when looking at the Content.xml file in the .odt zipped file. Word Perfect has a different set of codes which it uses. I do not see any correlation between the two. Without this, how can a do more than pretend to convert LO's styles from WP's "reveal codes"?
Dan _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
