On Friday 25 of January 2019, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 01:08:51PM +0100, Luboš Luňák <l.lunak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > No, those messages are not the errors that cause the failures, I listed > > it to show that the system lib is used even though there's the bundled > > one. > > The DLP libs had this problem as well, and these days we just patch the > externals to have a different .so name, see e.g.: > > external/libodfgen/libodfgen-bundled-soname.patch.0 > > (Other DLP libs are built statically.) > > Would it be an option to do the same for the GPG stuff? I'm not sure. That'd make soffice.bin load both instances of the lib, which would solve the problem of some symbols missing. But having two different versions of the same lib could possibly also cause clashes between them, since ELF interposition could make e.g. libgpgme bind some symbols to the system lib and other to the bundled lib (I've actually tried that, see the attachment). Which we could either ignore (I don't know likely is that to cause a real problem) or we'd need to namespace/version the whole library (which I don't know how much work that'd be). In the case of libgpg-error, I still think upgrading the system lib should be the simplest and best option. If I'm not mistaken, the system used for Jenkins build is some CentOS version with quite old software (LO can't be even built using its libgpg-error), so in the case of this specific library people shouldn't generally run into this problem anyway. -- Luboš Luňák l.lunak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
test_duplicated_lib.tar.gz
Description: application/tgz
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
