On 2018-08-31 11:52 a.m., Drew Jensen wrote: > Just curious if the Templates will also require a license to be eligible for the TDF site. I'd suggest that providing accurate information about the license for templates is even more critical than for extensions. I've come across a couple of templates whose intended usage is implicitly prohibited by the crayon license that it is distributed under. > Particularly in the case of templates with embedded scripts is not the license not valid if the user is not forced to agree to it? That depends upon: * the specific license: For example, GNU GPL 3.0 has no requirements for a user to accept, or reject a license; * the legal jurisdiction of the user: Both extension and template licenses can be construed as "shrink wrap", and as such, not be legally binding in some legal jurisdictions; ### Licenses for template is extremely tricky, because they can inadvertently govern the license that the created content can be distributed under. jonathon jonathon
Attachment:
0x51B69DC37C9DC30D.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
