It's been a while since I did this but I believe that you can have fq_codel as htb subclasses. I once did some experiments where I had fq_codel inside of drr inside of htb. It never went into production but it did seem to work: http://altheamesh.com/blog/dev-update-2/ (scroll down to the "traffic shaping" section). Also, when experimenting with this stuff, I can heartily recommend CORE, which is a network simulator made by the Navy: http://altheamesh.com/blog/using-core-for-network-simulation/ In the next few weeks I will need to design a TC setup of my own, so I may give your problem a try while I'm in the TC mindset. -- Jehan Tremback jehan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx On Fri, Dec 15, 2017, at 7:02 AM, Nathanial Byrnes wrote: > Hi There, > I run a small ISP. I am in the process of building out a new > centralized traffic management system which enforces our bandwidth > plans. What I am struggling with is if it is possibly to use fq_codel > or cake within, or perhaps as a subclass of, the rate limited flow of > a single customer. For instance, let's assume I have a customer with > a 10Mbpsx10Mbps data plan (contrived example...). Currently when they > are consuming the full 10x10 unless their router is employing cake or > fq_codel, their experience becomes unpleasant. I'd like to be able to > employ fq_codel or cake on their behalf such that when they are > hitting their limits (which I am imposing) Their overall experience is > not terrible. Is this doable on a single system? > > Thanks in advance, > Nate > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lartc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lartc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
