Re: Are there any alternatives to IFB for downlink shaping?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marco,

"action skbedit" is a simple tc action that edits skb packets in fairly straightforward ways, e.g. "action skbedit mark 1" edits the filtered packet to have mark == 1.

Generally, I prefer "tc filter" commands to "iptables -A" commands, mainly because the former are bound to an individual interface rather than to every netfilter chain call ever. :-)

________________________________________
From: lartc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <lartc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Marco Gaiarin <gaio@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 16 March 2015 16:26
To: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Are there any alternatives to IFB for downlink shaping?

> I now have tc doing this beautifully on the uplink traffic (I use 'action skbedit mark 1', why is this trick mentioned hardly anywhere?): but, like almost every other first time poster here :-) , I'm having no luck at all getting this working for downlink traffic.

?! Looking on google form 'skbedit' lead me to multiqueue management:

        https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/multiqueue.txt

and seems not related... can you explain better?--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lartc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux