I agree with Grant. Greg. On 04 ÎÎÏ 2011, at 21:06 , Grant Taylor wrote: > On 05/04/11 12:03, Radu Oprisan wrote: >> I can set-up another mailing list in the morning (8 PM now, EEST). >> Think we can get somebody else to join? > > I'm not opposed to a new mailing list in and of its self. > > However I think that this list (LARTC) is well known and documented all over the place. So even if we migrate elsewhere, there will still be people that stumble on to this list. > > I've personally noticed, for the last couple of years, that this list would be *EXTREMELY* delayed (as in weeks to months) for some unknown reason. - As I look at headers of some of the recent messages, I see that a message sat in the queue on the server for multiple months before being delivered to my mail server. > > Seeing that now messages seem to be flowing in a timely manner, I'd suggest that we give this list a week to a month probation to see if it has straightened up it's act. > > I'd also like a comment from the list maintainer or a moderator in his / her stead. > > Other than the above concern, I'll support moving to a new mailing list as long as there are messages to this list (so that they can be found in archives) indicating the move. > > > > Grant. . . . > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list > LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
