Re: About "b" meaning "byte" and bit

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    Hi Indunil :)

 * Indunil Jayasooriya <indunil75@xxxxxxxxx> dixit:
> On 8/31/07, DervishD <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >     Hi all :)
> >
> >     I think that this issue has already been discussed on this list, but
> > google didn't find anything interesting, so I'm bringing the subject
> > again.
> >
> >     The output of "tc" uses "b" meaning "byte" and "bit" for "bit". The
> > "official" suffixes for those units are "B" and "b", respectively, and
> > on top of this, I'm not sure if "kbit" means "kilobit" or "kibibit" in
> > "tc" output.
> >
> 
> SEE below that was taken form  this URL
> 
> http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm
> 
> 
> Please read: tc tool (not only HTB) uses shortcuts to denote units of rate.
> kbps means kilobytes and kbit means kilobits ! This is the most FAQ about tc
> in linux.

    Yes, I already knew that, what I was asking is why SI units are not
used and "shortcuts" are used instead: see my original message, I was
not sure if kilobit was being used correctly (meaning 1000 bits) or if
it was being used mistakenly for kibibit (1024 bits), and on top of
that, why "b" was being used as byte when the SI prefix for byte is "B".

    I mean, tc doesn't seem to follow any standard except maybe in
kilobit (which should be then used as kb, not kbit).

    Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

-- 
Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net
It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... RAmen!
We are waiting for 13 Feb 2009 23:31:30 +0000 ...
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux