[Please keep me in CC/To, I don't read lartc often]
Mario Antonio Garcia wrote:
I used to get an average of 18900kbit.
My hope was that these new patches would bring better accuracy.
Well, you're up from 94.5% to 99.95%, so they seem to do :)
Notice the 24 cburst. I am just trying to compensate the inaccuracy
this way. If I remove the cburst, obviously the shape rate I get goes
down.
Perhaps I am missing something. I am just a novice trying to get
exact bandwidth shaping. I have tested all the clock source types with
no good results.
A couple of comments:
- The patches so far only improve things on x86
- Try to test using UDP (not sure if you did) or simply a ping flood,
TCP is not ideal.
- iproute calculates burst values automatically. With the higher
precision clock source you can use a smaller value (also done
automatically if you don't specify them).
- HFSC is more precise than HTB (and not the least more complicated
to configure if you use only linear service curves)
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
