On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:47:38 +0200 DervishD <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I've tested this and having a cpufreq that slows down the CPU > affects the rate of HTB. My ondemand cpufreq governor scales down the > CPU frequency about 40% and this is more or less the slowdown the rate > suffers, 40%. This is expected behaviour when CONFIG_NET_SCH_CLK_CPU is defined: Say Y here if you want to use the CPU's cycle counter as clock source. This is a cheap and high resolution clock source, but on some architectures it is not synchronized on all processors and doesn't handle cpu clock frequency changes. > Any known way of dealing with this without having to disable > cpufreq? Yes, specify a different clock source in your kernel configuration. --atj _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
