Le 26 juil. 07 à 13:55, Georgi Alexandrov a écrit :
> Vincent Dautremont wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> here I have another newcomer question :-)
>> in the section 9.6.1 of this how too
>> we can read commands about filters :
>> ------------------------------------------
>>
>> # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 10: prio 1 u32 match \
>> ip dport 22 0xffff flowid 10:1
>> # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 10: prio 1 u32 match \
>> ip sport 80 0xffff flowid 10:1
>> # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 10: prio 2 flowid 10:2
>>
>> What does this say? It says: attach to eth0, node 10: a priority 1
>> u32
>> filter that matches on IP destination port 22 *exactly* and send
>> it to
>> band 10:1. And it then repeats the same for source port 80. The last
>> command says that anything unmatched so far should go to band
>> 10:2, the
>> next-highest priority.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------
>>
>> i try to do this at home as i want my ssh traffic prioritary to other
>> traffic but the problem is with the last command ! it simply don't
>> work.
>> The last command that says default trafic goes to prio 2 doesn't work
>>
>> # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 10: prio 2 flowid 10:2
>>
>> just give me the error: "Unknown filter flowid, hence option 1:2 is
>> unparsable"
>>
>> So I don't get what do I must do in order to say that the default
>> trafic
>> goes on priority 2 of the prio filter
>>
>> is this how too always valid with the current version of tc ? did
>> i do
>> something wrong ?
>>
>> Thank you for your help.
>>
> <snip>
>
> You should have posted *all* your tc rules.
>
> --
> regards,
> Georgi Alexandrov
>
> key server - pgp.mit.edu :: key id - 0x37B4B3EE
> Key fingerprint = E429 BF93 FA67 44E9 B7D4 F89E F990 01C1 37B4 B3EE
>
>
Ok, thanks for you advise, here are all my tc rules :
# tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio
# tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 u32 match ip
dport 22 0xffff flowid 1:1
# tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1: prio 2 flowid 1:2
----
does this lack one rule ? anyway the last one is not accepted by tc.
Vincent.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list