Leigh Sharpe wrote:
Nup. Well, not directly. This is going on our backbone, so I'm not taking traffic straight off the wireless. Ultimately, it will be delivered to a customer over a wireless link, but there's lots of ethernet between the QOS box and the wireless. By the way, wireless != 802.11, there's plenty of other flavours which all taste just like ethernet.
It was the numifbs 1000 and your sig that made me think wireless customers. I just saw a patch go in for ifb that fixes a potential crash. http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg28168.html Andy. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
