On Wednesday Nov 15, 2006 around 8:04am, Martin A. Brown wrote,
...
: # ip route add onlink default via 192.168.1.17 dev $DEV
: ?
:
: Because from the point of view of the kernel, 192.168.1.17 is
: unreachable, it must know the interface.
Absolutely! Thank you for the correction of my ommission.
Is there a reason that 'onlink' is not the default behaviour when
the device is specified? Would onlink add some information that
is missing? e.g.
ip route add 12.0.0.0/8 via 5.5.5.5 dev eth0
should mean that 5.5.5.5 is directly connected to eth0 (rightly
or wrongly).
&:-)
--
Overflow in kitchen sink. Do you want to report this error?
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
