Re: netmask 255.255.255.255 vs ip route add via ... (bug?)

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alexandru,

 : >   # ip route add onlink default via 192.168.1.17
 : >   
 : shouldn't be
 : 
 : # ip route add onlink default via 192.168.1.17 dev $DEV
 : ?
 : 
 : Because from the point of view of the kernel, 192.168.1.17 is 
 : unreachable, it must know the interface.

Absolutely!  Thank you for the correction of my ommission.

- -Martin

- -- 
Martin A. Brown
http://linux-ip.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgf-0.72 (http://linux-ip.net/sw/pine-gpg-filter/)

iD8DBQFFWx5ZHEoZD1iZ+YcRAizdAKCM9yVTH40l60mbxFx05ftapB9bPwCg4jKh
AGbZhbm15DCRTrtwnBtAlpk=
=yAvc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux