Leo Wetz wrote: > Hello, > > I have finally managed to understand HFSC up to a level which allowed me to > create a QoS script which maintains low VoIP latency while running stuff > like eMule. > > Unfortunately, HFSC seems to have a severe bug. > Why do I consider this as a bug defenitely? > Well, my script runs without any errors, then QoS works perfectly for some > hours, no error messages in kernel log. > Then randomly the kernel starts saying this: > > Sep 10 17:14:51 router kernel: HFSC: Non-work-conserving qdisc ? > Sep 10 17:14:56 router kernel: printk: 266 messages suppressed. > Sep 10 17:14:56 router kernel: HFSC: Non-work-conserving qdisc ? > Sep 10 17:15:01 router kernel: printk: 259 messages suppressed. > Sep 10 17:15:01 router kernel: HFSC: Non-work-conserving qdisc ? > Sep 10 17:15:06 router kernel: printk: 294 messages suppressed. > Sep 10 17:15:06 router kernel: HFSC: Non-work-conserving qdisc ? > > It floods the whole kernel log with this. > Traffic is also heavily affected by package loss when this happens, thus I > cannot ignore it. > I have to check my kernel log when I notice that I cannot access websites > anymore and then restart QoS manually. > > My complete QoS script is attached to this mail. > If this is not the right location for the bug report please tell me whom I > should contact. This is not a bug. You can't attach non-work-conserving qdiscs to HFSC (and it doesn't make any sense). Just use classes instead of adding HTB qdiscs. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
