IFB vs IMQ

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: IFB vs IMQ
From: "Rajesh Mahajan" <rajeshmahajan09@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 13:10:57 +0530
Delivered-to: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>

Is IFB realy replacement of IMQ

Please Guide

--
Failure seldom stops you. What stops you is the fear of failure.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IFB vs IMQ
  - From: Andy Furniss

Prev by Date: Hello New MAC / DHCP Request - How to spot the presents of a new MAC address...
Next by Date: routing multiple paths to inet
Previous by thread: Hello New MAC / DHCP Request - How to spot the presents of a new MAC address...
Next by thread: Re: IFB vs IMQ
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LARTC Home Page] [Netfilter] [Netfilter Development] [Network Development] [Bugtraq] [GCC Help] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux