RE: Sip Traffic

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



sounds good :-)

BTW,  someone  has tried  "ip_conntrack_sip" module from netfilter ????

(in order match and priorize VoIP Traffic ?  -SIP and RTP- )

thank you




-> -----Mensaje original-----
-> De: lartc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-> [mailto:lartc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]En nombre de Francisco
-> Enviado el: Jueves, 20 de Abril de 2006 11:19 p.m.
-> Para: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-> Asunto: Re:  Sip Traffic
->
->
-> L7 filter works very well too:
-> http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/
->
-> Although I didn't try it with sip, I use it to control my P2P and server
-> applications and have a very usable ADSL link at almost 100%
-> utilization of
-> my upstream.
->
->
-> El Martes, 18 de Abril de 2006 07:45, LinuXKiD escribió:
-> > mmm... intresting....
-> >
-> > http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/HowTo_configure_iptables
-> >
-> > ip_conntrack_sip
-> >
-> > Someone has tried it ?
-> >
-> > works on 2.4 kernel series ?
-> >
-> > thanks
-> >
-> >
-> >
-> >
-> > ->
-> > ->
-> > -> Hi I am pretty much a newbie, I found with sip if I match
-> ports 5060 and
-> > -> 10000 - 20000 it works I noticed on some phones the use
-> 13000 - 14000
-> > and -> others use 18000 - 19000.  there is a new sip-contrack
-> out although
-> > I -> haven't tried it yet.
-> > ->
-> > -> william
-> > ->
-> > -> -----Original Message-----
-> > -> From: lartc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-> > -> [mailto:lartc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
-> > -> On Behalf Of LinuXKiD
-> > -> Sent: 17 April 2006 15:59
-> > -> To: lartc
-> > -> Subject:  Sip Traffic
-> > ->
-> > ->
-> > -> Hi.
-> > ->
-> > -> there is a way to MARK udp VOIP (SIP) traffic,
-> > -> in order to put in a highest prio class ?
-> > ->
-> > -> Traffic flow seems start on udp 5060 port, but
-> > -> next both server and client seems jump to a
-> > -> random(?) port.
-> > ->
-> > -> I can't use CONNMARK because is udp traffic.
-> > ->
-> > -> I only see a pattern for L7 patch in order to
-> > -> SIP traffic identification , but I run 2.4
-> > -> kernel series .
-> > ->
-> > -> When you patch 2.4 kernel with L7 patch,
-> > -> later, Connmark (patch o matic ) can't apply.
-> > -> (conflicts)
-> > ->
-> > -> thank you.
-> > -> --
-> > -> Andres
-> > -> _______________________________________________
-> > -> LARTC mailing list
-> > -> LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-> > -> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
-> > ->
-> >
-> > _______________________________________________
-> > LARTC mailing list
-> > LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-> > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
-> _______________________________________________
-> LARTC mailing list
-> LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux