L7 filter works very well too: http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/ Although I didn't try it with sip, I use it to control my P2P and server applications and have a very usable ADSL link at almost 100% utilization of my upstream. El Martes, 18 de Abril de 2006 07:45, LinuXKiD escribió: > mmm... intresting.... > > http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/HowTo_configure_iptables > > ip_conntrack_sip > > Someone has tried it ? > > works on 2.4 kernel series ? > > thanks > > > > > -> > -> > -> Hi I am pretty much a newbie, I found with sip if I match ports 5060 and > -> 10000 - 20000 it works I noticed on some phones the use 13000 - 14000 > and -> others use 18000 - 19000. there is a new sip-contrack out although > I -> haven't tried it yet. > -> > -> william > -> > -> -----Original Message----- > -> From: lartc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > -> [mailto:lartc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > -> On Behalf Of LinuXKiD > -> Sent: 17 April 2006 15:59 > -> To: lartc > -> Subject: Sip Traffic > -> > -> > -> Hi. > -> > -> there is a way to MARK udp VOIP (SIP) traffic, > -> in order to put in a highest prio class ? > -> > -> Traffic flow seems start on udp 5060 port, but > -> next both server and client seems jump to a > -> random(?) port. > -> > -> I can't use CONNMARK because is udp traffic. > -> > -> I only see a pattern for L7 patch in order to > -> SIP traffic identification , but I run 2.4 > -> kernel series . > -> > -> When you patch 2.4 kernel with L7 patch, > -> later, Connmark (patch o matic ) can't apply. > -> (conflicts) > -> > -> thank you. > -> -- > -> Andres > -> _______________________________________________ > -> LARTC mailing list > -> LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > -> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc > -> > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list > LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
