Re: Class C network 223.255.255.x

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 09:53 +0200, the sew wrote:

> Nothing wrong with the official, my backbone is expanding quite alot
> and we adding quite alot of businesses with cables in building, and we
> use pppoe and radus to asign ip addresses, just looking for a block of
> addresses that most companies will never use. 

I assume your connected companies are using routeable ranges? If not, I
assume you're doing NAT?

In the first case imho there is no reason to not use a valid private
range...

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux