Re: Class C network 223.255.255.x

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 14:52 +0200, the sew wrote:
> Most networks are using either 10.x.x.x or 172.x.x.x or 192.168.x.x ,
> but was curious If I can use the range 223.255.255.x for my backbone
> routing, this looks like a nice block to use as most ppl don't use
> this, specially if you build quite a big intranet
> 
> what about the whole 223.x.x.x block, will this be used on the
> internet?

These are valid routable ip adresses, so you'd better not use them for
your own purposes.

What is wrong with the official private ranges?

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux