On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 14:52 +0200, the sew wrote: > Most networks are using either 10.x.x.x or 172.x.x.x or 192.168.x.x , > but was curious If I can use the range 223.255.255.x for my backbone > routing, this looks like a nice block to use as most ppl don't use > this, specially if you build quite a big intranet > > what about the whole 223.x.x.x block, will this be used on the > internet? These are valid routable ip adresses, so you'd better not use them for your own purposes. What is wrong with the official private ranges?
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc