Dnia wtorek, 28 marca 2006 19:06, William L. Thomson Jr. napisał: > On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 18:58 +0200, sAwAr wrote: > > According to: > > http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html > > This setup is responsible for sending answer with proper interface (witch > > it comes). > > Ignore it, it's not what you need or want. > > > my setup is copy of this (with some things from > > http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt but without them it stil wasn't wrok): > > Needs to be exact. > > http://www.docum.org/docum.org/faq/cache/57.html > That was my setup. To the T > > > According to > > http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html > > Don't use both. It's one or the other. You can't mix and match. I do not > believe the lartc doc on multiple links to be accurate. IMHO. The nano > how to is right on. 100%. > > If you read all of the nano how to, and follow it to the letter. You > well get the results you are after. Ok I'll start everything from begining once more and I will write after it. > Ignore it, it's not what you need or want. Why not ?? It is about two diferent isp and I have only on but I have two nic's with diferent nets it is just like two ISP in the example. I need (want to) split outgoing connections through two gw so I don't understand why this solution isn't for me. If you have access to serwer with load balancing could you just make similar test for me. I would like to compare with my results I belive that this will convince me that I'm wrong :]. ip ro g some.ip.intenet.1 ip ro g some.ip.intenet.2 ip ro g some.ip.intenet.3 ip ro g some.ip.intenet.4 ip ro g some.ip.intenet.5 My results once more. lucy linux # ip ro ge 80.48.56.3 80.48.56.3 via 80.48.56.65 dev eth0 src 192.168.200.10 cache mtu 1500 advmss 1460 metric 10 128 lucy linux # ip ro ge 80.48.56.2 80.48.56.2 via 80.48.56.65 dev eth0 src 80.48.56.70 cache mtu 1500 advmss 1460 metric 10 128 lucy linux # ip ro ge 80.48.56.1 80.48.56.1 via 80.48.56.65 dev eth0 src 192.168.200.10 cache mtu 1500 advmss 1460 metric 10 128 lucy linux # ip ro ge 80.48.56.4 80.48.56.4 via 80.48.56.65 dev eth0 src 80.48.56.70 cache mtu 1500 advmss 1460 metric 10 128 Thank you for quick answerss and patinent for my english. Pozdrawiam Szymon Mroofka P.S I've read your faq. I'm argueing with routing guru... ohh my ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Samochod zwany EOS... >>> http://link.interia.pl/f191c _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
