On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 01:43:11PM +1000, Russell Stuart wrote: > HTB Class structure the implements this: > > htb class parent 1: classid 1:10 rate 80% ceil 100% To my understanding, a root class that has a higher ceil than rate can always use bandwidth up to it's ceil. Thus it would be more correct to set the rate to 100% here (whatever that is) as well. > htb class parent 1:10 classid 1:11 rate 30% ceil 100% > htb class parent 1:11 classid 1:19 rate 30% ceil 100% prio 0 [VOIP leaf] If class 1:19 is the only child of class 1:11, it can always use whatever bandwidth the parent class can get. So the parent class does not have any limiting factor here and you can just skip it and attach 1:19 to 1:10 directly. > htb class parent 1:10 classid 1:20 rate 70% ceil 80% > htb class parent 1:20 classid 1:21 rate 20% ceil 80% prio 1 [interactive leaf] > htb class parent 1:20 classid 1:22 rate 50% ceil 80% prio 2 [other leaf] > > This is the small class tree I can think of that does it. The only difference to the tree before is that you grouped all non-voip traffic under a separate parent class which is capped at 80%, so voip always has 20% of available bandwidth which can not be taken away from it, right? If that was your intention, then it's fine. Regards Andreas Klauer _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
