Am Freitag, 3. März 2006 02:54 schrieb Russell Stuart: > On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 02:23 +0100, Markus Schulz wrote: > > The second rate table is 100% equivalent to realtime calc. But the > > static version differs for some ip-length values from it. And i > > don't understand why. > > Perhaps someone can point me to the difference? > > The program is only for testing rate tables calculations. > > > > It would be nice to do it without a htb or other qdisc module > > patch. And i think it should be possible :) > > It is not possible. > [.. convincing reasons ..] okay, thanks. After writing some rate tables on a paper i'm really understand the problematic. We need a htb patch or bigger rate tables (#==mtu) :) -- Markus Schulz A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q: Why is top posting bad? _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
