Re: Pb routing/fwmark

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jody Shumaker wrote:

[...]

This was definately your problem. How is this "connection tracking" ? all these rules say is, if the state matches established or related, then accept it. When that happens, no further processing is done. You basically made all packets for previously established or related connections not get marked as they left the chain before the mark targets. Running :
iptables -t mangle -L -xvn
Would have likely shown hardly any hits to the set mark rules, and the majority of the packets hitting those above 5 rules.

[...]

I only think you needed to either remove those -j ACCEPT targets, optionally change it so they are at the end of the chain, or atleast after the -j MARK targets.


In the general case with several interfaces, how to mark the packets so that some use one interface. I do not know if my configuration is correct.

Regards.
--
==============================================
|              FREDERIC MASSOT               |
|     http://www.juliana-multimedia.com      |
|   mailto:frederic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   |
===========================Debian=GNU/Linux===

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux