Re: connection tracking

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I wish I had known about this inthe past, I just don't recall seeing -I when I first learned iptables ages ago.  Using that is definately a good way one could insert a rule with priority over pre-existing rules.  I also don't think this feature has anything to do with the processor used. Another option Marius might want to consider is -R to replace rules, though it has limitations against any rules that match multiple addresses.

- Jody

On 12/22/05, Oscar Mechanic <oscar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Maybe I mis read or summit I do not know about arm.

Using FORWARD as example

but iptables -L FORWARD -vn --line-numbers
then doing a

iptables -D FORWARD <LINENUMBER> (to remove(yes there is a miliseconds
delay before the match starts happening))

and

iptables -I FORWARD <LINENUMBER> -m <SUMMIT> -j <SUMMIT>

No need to flush. You can even do the -I then the -D so you miss less
pkts. I must of got it wrong, too obvious from man iptables.


Happy Christmas, people of the Packets.
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 14:55 -0500, Jody Shumaker wrote:
> The iptables list of rules is read top to bottom, what is the problem
> with this? I have my script flush the table, then add everything in
> the order i want it in. The only case this might be a problem is where
> you want to insert a rule at a specific spot in the order, without
> flushing the table and causing it to momentarily not exist.  Right now
> I don't think that is possible.
>
> - Jody
>
> On 12/18/05, Marius Corici <coricim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>         Hello
>
>         I have some rules inserted in the NAT table dual SNAT and DNAT
>         for a connection
>         They use at some moment the same port of the outside network.
>
>         The problem i have is that the connection tracking in the
>         kernel checks first the oldest rule and then the newest one.
>         I use a system based on ARM XScale processor. Is that the
>         default behaviour and how can i change this behaviour?
>
>         Marius
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         LARTC mailing list
>         LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>         http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list
> LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux