Markus Schulz wrote:
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 14:23, Sophana Kok wrote:
Markus Schulz wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 16:03, Andy Furniss wrote:
I use something similar and use ceil 286kbit while synced at
288kbit without problems.
What thing similar do you use? I don't understand why it is not in
the kernel already.
sounds like he has calculated the constant overhead for each htb-class
and set the ceil value to according this. this is equivalent to the
stuff from adsl-optimizer. in both ways you need to setup classes for
packets with same average size or it won't work. Most important is the
class for ACK-only packets cause they have the biggest overhead.
correct me if i'm wrong.
Nothing to do with htb classes, though you are right about small packets
being a pain - they typically use 2 x 53 byte atm cells.
The patches make htb lookup the delay of one less than the aal5 length
in a table that is generated by a patched tc so the delay returned is
the delay of the packet when it is atm cells.
should be easy to patch in. Overhead is only a simple variable which
will be added in htb/* module for each paket. Only sign/unsign
problem should be considered.
How?
this refers to the possible negativ overhead mentioned from Andy Furniss
by use of pppoe.
It's pppoa, pppoe has > 14 overhead.
Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
