On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:54:17 +0200 Kenneth Kalmer <kenneth.kalmer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Guys hi >I don't know how healthy this is, and I don't have a clue on how to >improve the performance or lessen the load on the box. I've also been >contemplating moving the setup to a WRR-based solution, but I'm not >too sure if WRR can equally share local and gateway traffic as >different 'flows'. I don't understand this "2 kinds of traffic" concept. Where is the server? In the internet or local? If local, why the need to shape it at all? I can acknowledge though that under certain circumstances when you have several parallel WRR qdiscs, it leads to freezes. Perhaps if you explain in more detail what the network looks like I can give your more precise answers. >If possible, just share your thoughts on the best way to handle this >scenario with the 'dual' shaping, different speeds for traffic >originating from the network server and internet traffic flowing >through the server. The main emphasis is on equality, everyone on the >network needs to be happy. WRR is perfect when you need equality. [advertisement]Check out shurdix cough cough[/advertisement]. >Kind regards >Kenneth Kalmer Yours sincerely, Peter _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
