Jan Andersen wrote: > > I'm using Debian (sarge) > > I do now have 2 ISP, one DSL and one cabel. > > I want to use the DSL as my primary and only use the cabel-modem if the DSL > fails. > > The setup is: > > IP1 -> Router -> NAT_IP1 -> eth0 -> eth2 (LAN) > IP2 -> Cable-Modem -> eth1 -> eth2 (LAN) > > I wrote the following in my /etc/iproute2/rt_tables > > ip rule add from NAT_IP1 lookup 1 > ip route add 10.1.0.0/16 via 10.1.1.1 table 1 > ip route add 0/0 via NAT_IP1 table 1 > > ip rule add from IP2 lookup 2 > ip route add 10.1.0.0/16 via 10.1.1.1 table 2 > ip route add 0/0 via IP2 table 2 > > The problem is identical to http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1824/sam0201h/ > > But if I write "ip rule list" I get the following error: > > Database /etc/iproute2/rt_tables is corrupted at ip rule add from > 192.168.100.254 lookup 1 > > Does anyone know and have a solution to this problem? > > Regards > > Jan Andersen No, I don't have a solution. What is in your /etc/iproute2/rt_tables file? Normally, everything should be commented except 255 local 254 main 253 default 0 unspec Are you sure 'route add' should work when both routes are identical? Where does the 192.168.100.254 come from? Why allow NAT of the internet IPs? OPINION 1: One NAT is plenty, two is begging trouble. OPINION 2: Most of the problems reported here have "example.com" ip addresses, so avoiding NAT is A Good Thing. -- gypsy _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
