On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 03:40:05PM +0300, Wennie V. Lagmay wrote:
> Hi all,
hi
> As I read into the forum, NATting (SNAT) is expensive, using iptables to
> translate IP sucks the performance of the system.
Who says that? I never experienced this even on large networks. In fact I saw
cisco's NAT repeatedly freeze while an old pentium with linux was doing fine
in the same situation.
BTW iproute's NAT was apparently disabled some time ago because there were
problems. I think it's mentioned in the docs.
> Wennie
Bye,
Peter Surda (Shurdeek) <shurdeek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, ICQ 10236103, +436505122023
--
The product Microsoft sells isn't the software; it's comfort.
The product that Linux vendors usually sell is freedom.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
