I am looking for a simple way to guarantee to each flow going through my traffic control point 1/numflows of bandwidth. I thought using SFQ would do this effectively but it appears to be quite unfair: a very high speed download that fills the pipe easily starves smaller flows to the point where it becomes unusable (especially if they are at all interactive)
If you are shaping from the "wrong" end of the bottleneck then you need to back off from link speed to get control - and it still won't be perfect.
It's best to priorotise interactive traffic and not mix it with bulk traffic.
Andy.
Because numflows is dynamic, I'm not sure how I would have the bandwidth allocated to each flow change dynamically and automatically as flows are added and removed.
Anyone have an idea how to implement this? Thanks.
_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
