Hi Andy, I've followed your advice and it works brilliant. However, I did fail to mention something else which is causing a problem:
Internet - eth0 - eth1 users (192.168.x.x) local net- eth2 (10.0.x.x)
There is another interface in this router (eth2) that should not be shaped at all (it goes to another local network).
My problem is, I can shape Internet traffic going to user on eth1 (down), and user traffic going to Internet on eth0 (up). However, if the downspeed is being shaped on the eth1, that means that customers wanting something from eth2 will also be shaped.
I thought maybe I could only mark packets with a destination to eth0, which means packets going to eth2 would be left untouched, but that doesn't appear to work, or maybe I'm making a mistake.
here's my marking rule: iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING --src 192.168.0.84 -o eth0 -j MARK -- set-mark 34
I would change marking to FORWARD you can use -i and -o then so for upload from eth1 to internet.
iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -i eth1 -o eth0 -j MARK -- set-mark 34
and download
iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth1 -j MARK -- set-mark 34
and here's the cbq rules (should I be using HTB for this??)
I always use htb because it's what I am used to - I never really played around with CBQ so can't say it's better or worse.
When I first read LARTC it said HTB was easier - so that's what I used.
Andy. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
