On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 06:18:01PM +0000, Ed Wildgoose wrote: > > Are we all on the same page as to what the problem is? Any more > thoughts on how to tackle it? I'm still not convinced that delaying > ACK's is really any better than the current option to buffer incoming > data. basically, we have smaller queue because we are queueing the small ack, not the big data transfer on the downlink. and delaying ack is the first step to do the delay+advertised window resize that maybe someone (me?) will do in the future. > I guess the receiving machine TCP stack gets it earlier so the > app looks more responsive, but other than the lower lag I don't see much > difference really? > > Curious to hear how your project gets on though! Please keep us informed! of course! :) -- BOFH excuse #208: Your mail is being routed through Germany ... and they're censoring us. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
