On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:33:59 +0800 "Ming-Ching Tiew" <mingching.tiew@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: "Brad Barnett" <lists@xxxxxxx> > > > > It does, but before we go too much further, does anyone have an answer > > to my original question? I'm bogged for time (aren't well all? ;), > > and I'd prefer to just find out if my problems with DNAT are indeed > > from what I think... > > > > But I am getting at the point that you can't really do a proper NAT load > balancing without Julian's patches. You have to get it to compiled. > Period. > Well, you can do load balancing, but yes.. it is much improved (to say the least) with his patches. However, I misspoke. I was referring to simple routing for multiple providers. That is, just routing back out on the interface that traffic originates on. Unfortunately, since I can't apply Julian's patches, any benefits I might gain are not even worth consideration. :( Since I tried to apply his patches, and am unable to, please stop rubbing my nose in it. ;) I am aware that I am missing something, please don't make my loss seem ever more painful ;P _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
