Re: What is wrong here (continued...)?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Thursday 23 December 2004 17:52, Mark Williams (MWP) wrote:
> > > >As you can see class 25 has priority 8, so all other traffic should get
> > > >preference, which is not happening.
> > > >It almost seems like all the priorities are reversed...
> > >
> > > Err... I haven't checked the docs, but I think that's because the
> > > priorities are the other way around...
> >
> > Nope, the HTB man page says:
> >
> >       prio priority
> >               In the round-robin process, classes with the lowest
> >               priority  field are tried for packets first. Manda-
> >               tory.
> >
> > I did actually try reversed priorities after i made the graph, etc though.
> > It just made things worse... so they are in the correct order.
>
> If you have classes with different prio's, you have to know what's going on.  
> The class with the lowest prio has the highest priority.  This means that 
> that class will get the lowes delay ONLY if this class is not sending more 
> then the configured rate.  This also means that this class will get the 
> remaining bandwidth of the parent AFTER the other child classes are served.

Ok, so priorities are ignored as soon as used bandwidth of a class goes above
the "rate" setting?

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux