Re: Is 'publish' proxy arp still broken ?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Boreham wrote:
...
There seem to be a number of preconditions that
must be met before the arp...pub form of proxy arp
will work. If these conditions are not met the kernel
silently fails to answer the arp request (as oposed to
for example the user seeing an error message when
they run the user-space program).

First, the /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/<dev>/proxy_arp
must be enabled on the interface where you desire
arp responses to be sent.
...

I don't have this enabled and the syntax "arp -i eth0 -Ds 1.2.3.4 eth0 pub" is working as expected.

With /proc/.../proxy_arp enabled it seems that linux answers arp request for all ip addresses, which are routed to other interfaces, e.g. with this routing table:

192.168.1.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth1
10.0.0.0        0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0
0.0.0.0         10.0.0.1        0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0

it answers arp request on eth1 for _all_ foreign ip addresses except 192.168.1.0/24.

I saw it once, when a machine with ms windows was trying to find out its ip address from dhcp server, which I didn't have. It didn't get any and was trying to find unused one from the subnet 169.254.0.0/16 (link local addresses, RFC 3330) - it didn't succeed, because my linux router, which had /proc/.../proxy_arp enabled, answered all arp requests for this subnet...

--
Martin

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux