Traffic shaping : 2.6 better than 2.4

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: lartc <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Traffic shaping : 2.6 better than 2.4
From: Guillaume Urbejtel <gurbejtel_test@xxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:39:35 +0100
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control list <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: m6
Reply-to: gurbejtel_test@xxxxx
Sender: lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)

Dear all,

is the Traffic shaping part of the 2.6.x kernels works better than 2.4.x ?

Thanks !

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Prev by Date: tc del filter
Next by Date: Re: the list is down but I'm working on it
Previous by thread: tc del filter
Next by thread: is this list still operational?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LARTC Home Page] [Netfilter] [Netfilter Development] [Network Development] [Bugtraq] [GCC Help] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux