--- Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió: > Ricardo Soria wrote: > > --- Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > escribió: > > > >>Andy Furniss wrote: > >> > >> > >>>>So, my question would be, how to 'divide' or > >>>>'recognize' incoming and outgoing traffic, and > to > >>>>treat it as different channels?? I was thinking > >> > >>about > >> > >>>>using a IMQ device for incoming traffic, but > this > >>>>apperas to be a 'little bit' more complicated > >> > >>that > >> > >>>>what I expected. So, may it be a way to do this > >>>>without installing IMQ ?? > >>> > >>> > >>>Yes you will need IMQ. > >> > >>Second thoughts - you may be able to do without > IMQ > >>as long as it's just > >>forwarded traffic. > >> > >>Andy. > >> > >> > > > > > > Andy: > > > > What I am exactly doing is this: I receive all > > traffic from the cisco 1600, then, > > filter/shape/monitor it, then, if this traffic is > > destined to the remote subnet, it is send to the > cisco > > 827, but, if the traffic is for the local subnet > > (including both ciscos, and the linux box), > > The only thing you would need IMQ for is if you need > to shape traffic > from the 1600 to a local process on the linux box - > so you may - it > depends on what else you are running on the shaping > box that causes bulk > traffic to it. > > > it is > > directly delivered to its destination. All of > this is > > done via eth0, as much outgoing as incoming > traffic. > > So, specially cosidering about the local subnet, > do > > you think I should definitively use IMQ or not?? > > If eth0 has as much incoming as outgoing then there > is no traffic to > local process? > There may be traffic for a local (linux box) process, but the most of the traffic will be redirected or passed. > Do you want to shape eth0 aswell as the internet > link or is it OK for > spare bandwidth? > I cannot translate/understand perfectly this question, but I do need to shape the internet link. So, returning to the question that originated this discussion, how can I diferentiate/separate incoming and outgoing traffic for the same interface (eth0), without confusing each other, and without using IMQ devices if possible ?? > Andy. > > > > > > However, I have also posted in linuximq list, > because > > I cannot find IMQ patch for my linux box (Redhat > 7.3, > > 2.4.18-3 Kernel) > > > > Very thanks in advance. > > > > Ricardo. > > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en > Yahoo! Noticias. > > Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com > > > > > _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias. Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
