> It seems OK for me (many months) on 2.4 - I haven't tried it on 2.6 > yet. For me it is rock stable, too ;-). > If you want connbytes and connmark you need more than POM though. > > Someone posted a patch to this list a while back that let you use > both together. Someone wants connbytes and connmark at the same time? Here you have it again: http://www.chilan.com/pom-ng-connmarkbytes.tar.bz2 > Andy. -- Kind regards, Tomasz Chilinski _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
