On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 12:22:13PM +0200, Simon Lodal wrote: > > HFSC seems interesting, but does it really work well? I am not afraid of > new stuff, but bleeding edge is probably too risky. I'am running HFSC for network with 4,5k users, handling about 100Mb/s internet traffic with 25kpacket/s without any problems. > > That HTB problem, I guess you mean it is possible to have available > bandwidth, but when some of it has been distributed between users, all > users' ceils go below their quantums? no > > But that implies that users have low ceils? Wouldn't it be solved by > setting all users' ceil to the full link bandwidth? ceil is set to the full link bandwidth. I dosen't help. > > The doubly linked list patch you mention, I believe it should be in > vanilla kernel since 2.4.20-22 or something? I use 2.4.27 here. If not, > do you have a link for it? http://oss.sgi.com/projects/netdev/archive/2004-08/msg00348.html Consider also using rbtree HFSC patches. -- Tomasz Paszkowski
Attachment:
pgpd56zkRK41v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
