Hello W liście z wto, 24-08-2004, godz. 00:33, Joshua Snyder pisze: > I have been looking at the hfsc for some time as a replacement or at a > class that can be used like htb. But I seem to have run into a problem. > With htb classes it is easy to make three or more levels of priority for a > connection. All you need to do is to make classes and give them different > prio levels. But it seems like you can only define a real-time bandwidth > and a link sharing bandwidth. This seems like only 2 levels of priority. > Did I miss something? > > josh If you want hierarchic structure you can try putting sub-qdiscs in classes you want to have lower priority. The 'rt' service curves in that qdiscs' classes would dequeue not to root class but to classes they are attached to. I wonder what are the disadventages of such solution. -- Krzysztof Matusik <kyf@xxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
