Have you each ADSL line connected to a NIC ethernet ? You have 6 NIC ethernets ? bests andres -----Mensaje original----- De: lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]En nombre de Mark Coetser Enviado el: Sábado, 03 de Julio de 2004 08:33 a.m. Para: LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Asunto: load balanced adsl lines Hi Ppl I have 5 adsl lines that after reading quite a bit i managed to get load balanced now abvoiusly it doesnt load balance evenly and this works on what routes are still in the routing cache. my question is my outbound masquerading had to be modified to use snat in iptables instead of just plain masquerading my outbound masquerading now works but my inbound port forwarding doesnt work would this be an iptables problem or a routing issue... i have opened all the relavent ports on each of the interfaces and I am not getting any logged denies the connection just never opens I am running the following debian woody kernel 2.6.6 ip rule list 0: from all lookup local 32761: from 165.165.170.110 lookup T5 32762: from 165.165.187.47 lookup T4 32763: from 165.165.189.95 lookup T3 32764: from 165.165.163.95 lookup T2 32765: from 165.165.179.151 lookup T1 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default ip route sh 165.165.160.1 dev ppp1 proto kernel scope link src 165.165.163.95 165.165.160.1 dev ppp3 proto kernel scope link src 165.165.187.47 165.165.160.1 dev ppp4 proto kernel scope link src 165.165.170.110 165.165.160.1 dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src 165.165.179.151 165.165.160.1 dev ppp2 proto kernel scope link src 165.165.189.95 10.0.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.1 default nexthop via 165.165.160.1 dev ppp0 weight 1 nexthop via 165.165.160.1 dev ppp1 weight 1 nexthop via 165.165.160.1 dev ppp2 weight 1 nexthop via 165.165.160.1 dev ppp3 weight 1 nexthop via 165.165.160.1 dev ppp4 weight 1 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
