Hi, Anyone bothered to check : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibi this discussion just is too silly. ;-) regards, pieter frans On 9 Jun 2004 at 21:21, Stef Coene wrote: > On Wednesday 09 June 2004 01:31, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > But should we break existing scripts?? One possibility would be to make > > things case dependant (K = 1024 and k = 1000) or something like that. > I vote for yes. > What we can do, is use an other name so the difference is clear that it's not > tc, but the new tc. Mhh, why don't call this newtc? Or tcnew? Or tc2? > So people can use tc and not change the scripts, or use tcnew and change all > scripts accordingly. > > Stef > > -- > stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx > "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" > http://www.docum.org/ > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > ------------------------------000000--------------------------------- , , / \ ((__-^^-, -^^-__)) `- _---' `---_ -' `---|o` 'o|---' \ ` / ): :( :o_o: "-" Support Free Software : http://www.gnu.org/fsf/fsf.html and sign the petition : petition.eurolinux.org/index_html _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
