On Wednesday 09 June 2004 01:31, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > But should we break existing scripts?? One possibility would be to make > things case dependant (K = 1024 and k = 1000) or something like that. I vote for yes. What we can do, is use an other name so the difference is clear that it's not tc, but the new tc. Mhh, why don't call this newtc? Or tcnew? Or tc2? So people can use tc and not change the scripts, or use tcnew and change all scripts accordingly. Stef -- stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
