Re: Can anyone fix this?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, 

What do you mean by direct queue? If I do not have any filter rules for a 
packet, I thought it would not be limited at all...

Best regards,
Dmitry Golubev

On Sunday 23 May 2004 19:37, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dmitry Golubev wrote:
> > Quote from LATRC: Also, with HTB, you should attach all filters to the
> > root!
>
> Then LARTC is wrong. HTB first tries to classify by priority,
> if that fails it follows the filter chain from the root until
> it hits a leaf-class, if that fails it tries if the default
> class is a leaf-class, if even that fails it uses the direct
> queue. BTW, HFSC does it the same way, but there is no direct
> queue, so unclassified packets are just dropped.
>
> Regards
> Patrick
>
> > Dmitry
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux