Re: R2Q and more

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 24 March 2004 16:46, Mihai Vlad wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I have several questions:
>
> Let's take a real case example...
> A connection of 256kbit split among some clients (8kbit RATE, 1500 QUANTUM
> - set manually).
> I use esfq to split the bandwidth as fair as possible.
>
> Q1.	What happens if the SUM of all the clients' class RATE (+ the
> default class RATE) is smaller than 256kbit? Will HTB work correctly?
Yes.

> Q2.	What happens if the SUM of all the clients' class RATE (+ the
> default class RATE) is bigger than 256kbit? Will HTB work correctly?
Yes.

> Q3.	What happens if the ISP does not guarantee a "full 256kbit"
> bandwidth?
> (Suppose that I set my Linux box to shape 256kbit and my ISP provides me
> only 128kbit during high-traffic hours). Will HTB work correctly?
Yes.

> Q4.	As far as I understood R2Q means the ratio between the RATE and the
> QUANTUM of a class... Which is more "powerful"? The RATE, or the QUANTUM?
> (e.g.	ClassA---QUANTUM 3000---RATE 8kbit, or
> 	ClassB---QUANTUM 1500---RATE 16kbit)
r2q is used to calculate the default quantum of a class: quantum = rate / r2q
But you can overrule this default quantum when you add a class.

> Q5.	The HTB Manual says that the sum of the LEAF CLASSES RATE must be
> equal to the PARENT CLASS RATE. Is there such a rule for QUANTUMS?
No.

Stef

-- 
stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/


[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux