> Isn't the same possible in /lartc.org 12.3.2. Overlimit actions / and > "reclassify" option /which i din't used yet/. Interesting idea - Let me try if this works first. > next, you must use IMQ to pass every traffic from eth2, /because as i'm > thinking there isn't possible to do reclassify packet which is already > routed to some interface, and next put the same packet over other > interface based on some policy - PLEASE CORRECT ME!!! / Only way to find out is to try it, I think. > I don't know how to put all traffic which is destined for eth0, to some IMQ > device, next police packets there by "reclassify" options. > All the settings must be according to your full bandwidth of eth0, so all > which is overlimit eth0 speed get reclassify to other TOS. > After all packets which leaves imq, are routed again by system, > if you have differented TOS routing, /if your IGP routing domain create > such Traffic Engineered path/ then packets with such other TOS will get > outside from eth1. > > /this is my teory, to correct or discuss / > > This what you are trying to do is somehow Traffic Engineering or > Contraint Based Routing. I'm very pleased to be with contact with > somebody who is intend/or already done with some work with linux in this > topic. Correct - that's exactly what I'm trying to do. > Now i elaborate how to control distribution of MPLS labels which must be > according to current interface load or even interface load with each QoS > class /in linux/. That's slightly above the scope of what I need right now - but it is something I will need soon. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
