Re: Fair queueing: SFQ vs TBF

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ESFQ.  Unlike SFQ, it allows you to use source address to define queues.

Lot's of people want this type of fair queuing, it should be standard in the
kernel.

> Hello,
> 
>    I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with
> several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number?
> Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this
> job, but it's only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine's 2.4.22.
>    So what is better: SFQ or TBF?

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux