I disagree here. You can easily use IPTables to mark packets based on just about anything (source/dest IP, MAC, source/dest port, etc). You can then use those marks to assign traffic to the HTB classes you wish. Mike Fetherston > -----Original Message----- > From: Roy [mailto:roy@xxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 1:14 PM > To: LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Controlling only delay using HTB without stealing > excess bandwidth > > htb is very primitive trafic managing system (if compare it with ipatbles) > because it was designed for high speed, and not quality > > Anyway it is not easy to make what you want because delay is the same as > priority > so the first function is just side effect of second. > > There is no easy way to make what you want. > > > > > Hi Gurus, > > The documentation isn't terribly clear, but it seems that the HTB 'prio' > field has two separate functions: > 1. Classes with lower prio get all the excess bandwidth first. > 2. Classes with lower prio get lower delay. > > I want just #2 - and not #1 > In other words, for example lets say that I have a 100kbps link, divided > to classes A and B as following. > > A - rate=20kbps limit=100kbps > B - rate=20kbps limit=100kbps > > How can I get class B to have a lower delay than A, while still sharing > the excess bandwidth fairly with A? > > Thanks, > Aron Brand > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
